千匹超跑
1,000-HP Road Legal Le Mans Hypercar Is One Step Closer To Reality
A track day version will be even lighter still, at 2,094 lbs. However, it will ditch the hybrid system in favor of a 641-hp V8. The race-ready variant rounds off the offerings with 700 hp. No performance figures are provided for any of the models, but we expect the road-legal version to be close to the Aston Martin Valkyrie in this department.
The Gaydon-based brand is promising even more power, with combined outputs pegged at 1,160 horses and 663 lb-ft of torque. Like the Vanwall Vandervell 1000, there’s a (Rimac-designed) electric motor on board. But the Valkyrie doesn’t use a measly V8; in true Aston Martin fashion, there’s a naturally aspirated 6.5-liter V12 under the rear decklid.
With a top speed of more than 200 mph and a 0 to 60 mph time of fewer than three seconds, it’s massively quick. We expect the Vandervell 1000 to achieve similar figures. Of course, Aston Martin also has the track-only Valkyrie AMR Pro, which looks to be extremely capable.
1,000-HP Road Legal Le Mans Hypercar Is One Step Closer To Reality
A track day version will be even lighter still, at 2,094 lbs. However, it will ditch the hybrid system in favor of a 641-hp V8. The race-ready variant rounds off the offerings with 700 hp. No performance figures are provided for any of the models, but we expect the road-legal version to be close to the Aston Martin Valkyrie in this department.
The Gaydon-based brand is promising even more power, with combined outputs pegged at 1,160 horses and 663 lb-ft of torque. Like the Vanwall Vandervell 1000, there’s a (Rimac-designed) electric motor on board. But the Valkyrie doesn’t use a measly V8; in true Aston Martin fashion, there’s a naturally aspirated 6.5-liter V12 under the rear decklid.
With a top speed of more than 200 mph and a 0 to 60 mph time of fewer than three seconds, it’s massively quick. We expect the Vandervell 1000 to achieve similar figures. Of course, Aston Martin also has the track-only Valkyrie AMR Pro, which looks to be extremely capable.
#音日常# 每周上英语课真的是心灵治愈，告诉你犯错不可怕，告诉你口音没关系，告诉你在英语课上也可以多多用中文表达，怎么会有这么暖的老师[泪]
“Progress to a higher stage does not always mean fewer errors. An increase in error may be an indication of progress.”
这句话也适用于大家[心]
“Progress to a higher stage does not always mean fewer errors. An increase in error may be an indication of progress.”
这句话也适用于大家[心]
2019 Text3
“离开外籍劳工，美国农场将不具有竞争性”
要定位好句子！！！是解题的关键
如34题
注意出现在首段，中间，最后 的 独句段→很有可能是文章的中心主旨
如35题
注意选项“拔刀相助”→主观想法，文章没有依据
根据某两段...→得出的要是两段的共同观点
3⃣ 1⃣ .细节题
题干:根据前两段所述，什么问题应该得到处理？
❌ A项: 对美国外籍劳工的歧视
B项: 对某些美国企业法律的偏袒
→无中生有
❌ D项: 美国农业就业机会减少→偷换概念
原文: 美国劳动力短缺，而不是就业机会少
C项: 美国劳工移民政策的缺点
原文: 第①段 The complaints are unlikely to stop without an overhaul(彻底改革) of immigration rules for farm workers.
第②段 Congress has obstructed efforts......If this don't change........
3⃣ 2⃣ .细节题
题干: 美国农业劳动力的一个问题是
❌ A项: 非法移民的增加→与原文不符
原文: As fewer such workers enter...
❌ B项: 农作物工人的高流动性
原文: they likely ro be settled rather than migrating....
❌ C项: 有经验工人的短缺
→无中生有
D项: 外籍农工的老龄化
原文: They are also aging.
3⃣ 3⃣ .细节题
题干: 备受争议的解决美国农业劳动力短缺的方法是什么
❌ A项: 吸引更年轻的工人去务农
→ 拔刀相助，文章未提及
B项: 让美国本土工人回归农业
原文: 这个备受争议的对策仍然一如既往地不现实: 美国本土工人不会回归农场
3⃣ 4⃣ .细节题
题干: 农业雇主抱怨H-2A签证，是因为它
A项: 签发过程缓慢
原文: Even so , employers complain they .....The process is cumbersome(缓慢复杂的)，expensive and unreliable.
❌ D项: 控制签发人数
原文: The H-2A has no numerical cap
3⃣ 5⃣ . 中心主旨题
第①②段→劳动力短缺，农工移民政策欠缺
第③段→提出不可行措施: 美国本土人回归农业
第④段→不可行措施2: 用机器人代替人力
第⑤⑥段→提出现行措施: 签发签证
分析这个措施缺陷
第⑦段→提出其他相关措施: 引入农产品
第⑧段→总结，重申主题: 要么引入食品，要么引入劳工
➡ 中心主旨: 要么引入食品，要么引入劳工
→ B项
“离开外籍劳工，美国农场将不具有竞争性”
要定位好句子！！！是解题的关键
如34题
注意出现在首段，中间，最后 的 独句段→很有可能是文章的中心主旨
如35题
注意选项“拔刀相助”→主观想法，文章没有依据
根据某两段...→得出的要是两段的共同观点
3⃣ 1⃣ .细节题
题干:根据前两段所述，什么问题应该得到处理？
❌ A项: 对美国外籍劳工的歧视
B项: 对某些美国企业法律的偏袒
→无中生有
❌ D项: 美国农业就业机会减少→偷换概念
原文: 美国劳动力短缺，而不是就业机会少
C项: 美国劳工移民政策的缺点
原文: 第①段 The complaints are unlikely to stop without an overhaul(彻底改革) of immigration rules for farm workers.
第②段 Congress has obstructed efforts......If this don't change........
3⃣ 2⃣ .细节题
题干: 美国农业劳动力的一个问题是
❌ A项: 非法移民的增加→与原文不符
原文: As fewer such workers enter...
❌ B项: 农作物工人的高流动性
原文: they likely ro be settled rather than migrating....
❌ C项: 有经验工人的短缺
→无中生有
D项: 外籍农工的老龄化
原文: They are also aging.
3⃣ 3⃣ .细节题
题干: 备受争议的解决美国农业劳动力短缺的方法是什么
❌ A项: 吸引更年轻的工人去务农
→ 拔刀相助，文章未提及
B项: 让美国本土工人回归农业
原文: 这个备受争议的对策仍然一如既往地不现实: 美国本土工人不会回归农场
3⃣ 4⃣ .细节题
题干: 农业雇主抱怨H-2A签证，是因为它
A项: 签发过程缓慢
原文: Even so , employers complain they .....The process is cumbersome(缓慢复杂的)，expensive and unreliable.
❌ D项: 控制签发人数
原文: The H-2A has no numerical cap
3⃣ 5⃣ . 中心主旨题
第①②段→劳动力短缺，农工移民政策欠缺
第③段→提出不可行措施: 美国本土人回归农业
第④段→不可行措施2: 用机器人代替人力
第⑤⑥段→提出现行措施: 签发签证
分析这个措施缺陷
第⑦段→提出其他相关措施: 引入农产品
第⑧段→总结，重申主题: 要么引入食品，要么引入劳工
➡ 中心主旨: 要么引入食品，要么引入劳工
→ B项
✋热门推荐