#考研英语# 【每日一句】
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency. The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises. But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
It can be inferred from the text that_____.
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
思考题解析：
从文章中可以得知____
It can be inferred from the text that _____
从文章中可以得知____
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
（ A ）法律上的胜利是对人权的侵犯
原文说了比利时政府违背气候原则才是对人权的侵犯。
所以A选项不对！
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(B) 政府的努力受到法官的赞扬
首先政府没努力
其次法官没有赞扬政府！
所以B不对！
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(C) 政府接受非政府组织的要求
政府没有接受非政府组织的要求
所以C不对！
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
(D)非政府组织的要求违反了制衡原则
正确！
对应最后一句：
this=NGO’s demand
the separation of powers= the check and balance
violate=breach 破坏！
长难句解析
（二）
长难句解析：
注释：黄色代表句子主干，红色代表定语，绿色代表状语，蓝色代表主干中较长的宾语从句，紫色代表同位语
第一句：
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency.
参考译文：布鲁塞尔一家法院裁定，比利时未能实现气候目标是对人权的侵犯；这是针对那些没能兑现应对环境危机承诺的政府当局的最新法律胜利。
第二句：
The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises.
参考译文：荷兰、德国和法国之前也做出过类似的裁决，这些国家的法官谴责政府应对气候危机不力或未能履行承诺。
第三句：
But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
参考译文：但法官们拒绝了该非政府组织提出的向政府施加新的、更严格的碳减排目标的要求，称这将违反权力的分立。
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency. The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises. But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
It can be inferred from the text that_____.
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
思考题解析：
从文章中可以得知____
It can be inferred from the text that _____
从文章中可以得知____
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
（ A ）法律上的胜利是对人权的侵犯
原文说了比利时政府违背气候原则才是对人权的侵犯。
所以A选项不对！
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(B) 政府的努力受到法官的赞扬
首先政府没努力
其次法官没有赞扬政府！
所以B不对！
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(C) 政府接受非政府组织的要求
政府没有接受非政府组织的要求
所以C不对！
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
(D)非政府组织的要求违反了制衡原则
正确！
对应最后一句：
this=NGO’s demand
the separation of powers= the check and balance
violate=breach 破坏！
长难句解析
（二）
长难句解析：
注释：黄色代表句子主干，红色代表定语，绿色代表状语，蓝色代表主干中较长的宾语从句，紫色代表同位语
第一句：
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency.
参考译文：布鲁塞尔一家法院裁定，比利时未能实现气候目标是对人权的侵犯；这是针对那些没能兑现应对环境危机承诺的政府当局的最新法律胜利。
第二句：
The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises.
参考译文：荷兰、德国和法国之前也做出过类似的裁决，这些国家的法官谴责政府应对气候危机不力或未能履行承诺。
第三句：
But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
参考译文：但法官们拒绝了该非政府组织提出的向政府施加新的、更严格的碳减排目标的要求，称这将违反权力的分立。
#考研英语# 【每日一句】
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency. The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises. But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
It can be inferred from the text that_____.
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
思考题解析：
从文章中可以得知____
It can be inferred from the text that _____
从文章中可以得知____
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
（ A ）法律上的胜利是对人权的侵犯
原文说了比利时政府违背气候原则才是对人权的侵犯。
所以A选项不对！
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(B) 政府的努力受到法官的赞扬
首先政府没努力
其次法官没有赞扬政府！
所以B不对！
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(C) 政府接受非政府组织的要求
政府没有接受非政府组织的要求
所以C不对！
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
(D)非政府组织的要求违反了制衡原则
正确！
对应最后一句：
this=NGO’s demand
the separation of powers= the check and balance
violate=breach 破坏！
长难句解析
（二）
长难句解析：
注释：黄色代表句子主干，红色代表定语，绿色代表状语，蓝色代表主干中较长的宾语从句，紫色代表同位语
第一句：
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency.
参考译文：布鲁塞尔一家法院裁定，比利时未能实现气候目标是对人权的侵犯；这是针对那些没能兑现应对环境危机承诺的政府当局的最新法律胜利。
第二句：
The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises.
参考译文：荷兰、德国和法国之前也做出过类似的裁决，这些国家的法官谴责政府应对气候危机不力或未能履行承诺。
第三句：
But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
参考译文：但法官们拒绝了该非政府组织提出的向政府施加新的、更严格的碳减排目标的要求，称这将违反权力的分立。
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency. The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises. But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
It can be inferred from the text that_____.
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
思考题解析：
从文章中可以得知____
It can be inferred from the text that _____
从文章中可以得知____
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
（ A ）法律上的胜利是对人权的侵犯
原文说了比利时政府违背气候原则才是对人权的侵犯。
所以A选项不对！
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(B) 政府的努力受到法官的赞扬
首先政府没努力
其次法官没有赞扬政府！
所以B不对！
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(C) 政府接受非政府组织的要求
政府没有接受非政府组织的要求
所以C不对！
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
(D)非政府组织的要求违反了制衡原则
正确！
对应最后一句：
this=NGO’s demand
the separation of powers= the check and balance
violate=breach 破坏！
长难句解析
（二）
长难句解析：
注释：黄色代表句子主干，红色代表定语，绿色代表状语，蓝色代表主干中较长的宾语从句，紫色代表同位语
第一句：
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency.
参考译文：布鲁塞尔一家法院裁定，比利时未能实现气候目标是对人权的侵犯；这是针对那些没能兑现应对环境危机承诺的政府当局的最新法律胜利。
第二句：
The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises.
参考译文：荷兰、德国和法国之前也做出过类似的裁决，这些国家的法官谴责政府应对气候危机不力或未能履行承诺。
第三句：
But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
参考译文：但法官们拒绝了该非政府组织提出的向政府施加新的、更严格的碳减排目标的要求，称这将违反权力的分立。
#考研英语# 【每日一句】
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency. The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises. But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
It can be inferred from the text that_____.
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
思考题解析：
从文章中可以得知____
It can be inferred from the text that _____
从文章中可以得知____
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
（ A ）法律上的胜利是对人权的侵犯
原文说了比利时政府违背气候原则才是对人权的侵犯。
所以A选项不对！
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(B) 政府的努力受到法官的赞扬
首先政府没努力
其次法官没有赞扬政府！
所以B不对！
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(C) 政府接受非政府组织的要求
政府没有接受非政府组织的要求
所以C不对！
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
(D)非政府组织的要求违反了制衡原则
正确！
对应最后一句：
this=NGO’s demand
the separation of powers= the check and balance
violate=breach 破坏！
长难句解析
（二）
长难句解析：
注释：黄色代表句子主干，红色代表定语，绿色代表状语，蓝色代表主干中较长的宾语从句，紫色代表同位语
第一句：
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency.
参考译文：布鲁塞尔一家法院裁定，比利时未能实现气候目标是对人权的侵犯；这是针对那些没能兑现应对环境危机承诺的政府当局的最新法律胜利。
第二句：
The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises.
参考译文：荷兰、德国和法国之前也做出过类似的裁决，这些国家的法官谴责政府应对气候危机不力或未能履行承诺。
第三句：
But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
参考译文：但法官们拒绝了该非政府组织提出的向政府施加新的、更严格的碳减排目标的要求，称这将违反权力的分立。
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency. The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises. But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
It can be inferred from the text that_____.
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
思考题解析：
从文章中可以得知____
It can be inferred from the text that _____
从文章中可以得知____
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
（ A ）法律上的胜利是对人权的侵犯
原文说了比利时政府违背气候原则才是对人权的侵犯。
所以A选项不对！
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(B) 政府的努力受到法官的赞扬
首先政府没努力
其次法官没有赞扬政府！
所以B不对！
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(C) 政府接受非政府组织的要求
政府没有接受非政府组织的要求
所以C不对！
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
(D)非政府组织的要求违反了制衡原则
正确！
对应最后一句：
this=NGO’s demand
the separation of powers= the check and balance
violate=breach 破坏！
长难句解析
（二）
长难句解析：
注释：黄色代表句子主干，红色代表定语，绿色代表状语，蓝色代表主干中较长的宾语从句，紫色代表同位语
第一句：
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency.
参考译文：布鲁塞尔一家法院裁定，比利时未能实现气候目标是对人权的侵犯；这是针对那些没能兑现应对环境危机承诺的政府当局的最新法律胜利。
第二句：
The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises.
参考译文：荷兰、德国和法国之前也做出过类似的裁决，这些国家的法官谴责政府应对气候危机不力或未能履行承诺。
第三句：
But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
参考译文：但法官们拒绝了该非政府组织提出的向政府施加新的、更严格的碳减排目标的要求，称这将违反权力的分立。
✋热门推荐