Goat！！ACFC 执行总裁 Uhrman 评论二姐的影响时，说了这句话：Young boys are wearing their jerseys and saying that Christen Press is as important to them as LeBron James.
众所周知，二姐为人低调，很多事情，都是从别人嘴里说出来，球迷才知道。二姐属于情商智商球商都高的人，但是为人谦虚。对年轻球员的倾囊相授，对老战友们的赏识，对其他国家球员的尊重等等。作为球员，当她被人称为传奇或者 Goat ，球技和球队荣誉是基础，还有就是在球场外所做的事情[心]，说的少做的多，看她做了什么，怎么做的[赞]。
众所周知，二姐为人低调，很多事情，都是从别人嘴里说出来，球迷才知道。二姐属于情商智商球商都高的人，但是为人谦虚。对年轻球员的倾囊相授，对老战友们的赏识，对其他国家球员的尊重等等。作为球员，当她被人称为传奇或者 Goat ，球技和球队荣誉是基础，还有就是在球场外所做的事情[心]，说的少做的多，看她做了什么，怎么做的[赞]。
Remember when someone questions or doesn't understand your path
It's because it's yours.
Never been done before.
So no one has really any sayon how you will do it.
Trust that you are guided as long as you live in alignment with yourself.
Life is not perfect.
You'll have rainy days and stormy night.
But like flowers you'll always shine and bloom at the perfect time.
Stay happy and beautiful and always love yourself.No matter how depression trying to knock you down just rest,chill for a while but never give up.[作揖][加油]
It's because it's yours.
Never been done before.
So no one has really any sayon how you will do it.
Trust that you are guided as long as you live in alignment with yourself.
Life is not perfect.
You'll have rainy days and stormy night.
But like flowers you'll always shine and bloom at the perfect time.
Stay happy and beautiful and always love yourself.No matter how depression trying to knock you down just rest,chill for a while but never give up.[作揖][加油]
#考研英语[超话]# 【每日一句】
Some studies show that choosing vegetarian options would only reduce greenhouse gas emissions per person by 3%. Others show a reduction in emissions per person of 20-30%. “Probably the most important thing to point out is that emissions are often viewed as the only metric of sustainability: they are not. Impacts of farming systems on carbon sequestration, water quality, and broader ecosystem services also need to be well considered,” said Matthew Harrison.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
Which of the following is true according to the text?
A.Some believe going vegan do not reduce emissions.
B.Sustainability can be measured only by emissions.
C.Matthew Harrison is fighting against vegan diet.
D.The literature on the impact of going vegan varies.
思考题解析：
A.Some believe going vegan do not reduce emissions.
（一些人相信素食不会减少排放量）
只是有些人认为减少的不多而已，而不是不会减少。
A选项错误。
B. Sustainability can be measured only by emissions.
（可持续性只能由排放量来衡量）
第三句指出不是这样的。
B选项错误。
C. Matthew Harrison is fighting against vegan diet.
（马修·哈里森正在对抗素食）
没有说，所以错！
C选项错误。
D. The literature on the impact of going vegan varies.
(关于素食的影响的文献差别很大)
第一句说：
一些研究表明，选择素食只会让人均温室气体排放量减少3%。
第二句说：
另一些研究则显示，人均排放量会减少20-30%。
所以，关于素食的影响的文献差别很大，D选项正确。
长难句解析
（二）
词汇突破：
vegetarian 素食
metric 衡量
sustainability 可持续性
carbon sequestration碳封存,
soil acidification 土壤酸化
长难句解析：
注释：注：黄色是主干，红色是定语，绿色是状语，紫色是同位语，蓝色是作为灵活机动的表示
第一句：
Some studies show that choosing vegetarian options would only reduce greenhouse gas emissions per person by 3%.
参考译文：
一些研究表明，选择素食只会让人均温室气体排放量减少3%。
第二句：
Others show a reduction in emissions per person of 20-30%.
参考译文：
另一些研究则显示，人均排放量会减少20-30%。
第三句：
“Probably the most important thing to point out is that emissions are often viewed as the only metric of sustainability: they are not. Impacts of farming systems on carbon sequestration, water quality, and broader ecosystem services also need to be well considered,” said Matthew Harrison.
参考译文：
“也许最重要的是要指出，排放量通常被视为衡量可持续性的唯一指标：但它们不是。农业系统对碳封存、水质和更广泛的生态系统服务的影响也需要被充分考虑，”马修·哈里森说。
Some studies show that choosing vegetarian options would only reduce greenhouse gas emissions per person by 3%. Others show a reduction in emissions per person of 20-30%. “Probably the most important thing to point out is that emissions are often viewed as the only metric of sustainability: they are not. Impacts of farming systems on carbon sequestration, water quality, and broader ecosystem services also need to be well considered,” said Matthew Harrison.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
Which of the following is true according to the text?
A.Some believe going vegan do not reduce emissions.
B.Sustainability can be measured only by emissions.
C.Matthew Harrison is fighting against vegan diet.
D.The literature on the impact of going vegan varies.
思考题解析：
A.Some believe going vegan do not reduce emissions.
（一些人相信素食不会减少排放量）
只是有些人认为减少的不多而已，而不是不会减少。
A选项错误。
B. Sustainability can be measured only by emissions.
（可持续性只能由排放量来衡量）
第三句指出不是这样的。
B选项错误。
C. Matthew Harrison is fighting against vegan diet.
（马修·哈里森正在对抗素食）
没有说，所以错！
C选项错误。
D. The literature on the impact of going vegan varies.
(关于素食的影响的文献差别很大)
第一句说：
一些研究表明，选择素食只会让人均温室气体排放量减少3%。
第二句说：
另一些研究则显示，人均排放量会减少20-30%。
所以，关于素食的影响的文献差别很大，D选项正确。
长难句解析
（二）
词汇突破：
vegetarian 素食
metric 衡量
sustainability 可持续性
carbon sequestration碳封存,
soil acidification 土壤酸化
长难句解析：
注释：注：黄色是主干，红色是定语，绿色是状语，紫色是同位语，蓝色是作为灵活机动的表示
第一句：
Some studies show that choosing vegetarian options would only reduce greenhouse gas emissions per person by 3%.
参考译文：
一些研究表明，选择素食只会让人均温室气体排放量减少3%。
第二句：
Others show a reduction in emissions per person of 20-30%.
参考译文：
另一些研究则显示，人均排放量会减少20-30%。
第三句：
“Probably the most important thing to point out is that emissions are often viewed as the only metric of sustainability: they are not. Impacts of farming systems on carbon sequestration, water quality, and broader ecosystem services also need to be well considered,” said Matthew Harrison.
参考译文：
“也许最重要的是要指出，排放量通常被视为衡量可持续性的唯一指标：但它们不是。农业系统对碳封存、水质和更广泛的生态系统服务的影响也需要被充分考虑，”马修·哈里森说。
✋热门推荐