Mar 15, 2022 - Someone drops a lucky charm in your lap today and you will have this lucky charm for the next three weeks. Regardless of the day-to-day ups and downs, today marks the start of a very positive three-week cycle for you, in which you will flourish.#北京空气质量##BeijingAirNow##一目了然[超话]#
Samantha scooped her lap dog, gave it a peck, then rested it on her shoulder. Crossing herself and taking a deep breath, she walked toward the dais, where she, as this year's valedictorian, was going to deliver the commencement speech. Samantha obviously wanted to share this once-in-a-lifetime moment with this little critter, who had been with her since they found each other on her first day of college.
【F1|国际汽联驳回梅赛德斯车队上诉理由】
在充满戏剧性的阿布扎比大奖赛结束后,梅赛德斯车队针对比赛中的两个有争议的部分,并根据《根据国际汽联运动规则》中的48.12及第48.8条款向FIA国际联提出上诉,但均遭到了驳回,下面就让我们一起来看看双方的辩论以及FIA给出的驳回理由。
梅赛德斯车队代表成员:
‐ Ron Meadows(运动总监)
‐ Andrew Shovlin(赛道工程总监)
‐ Paul Harris (车队法律顾问)
红牛车队代表成员:
‐ Jonathan Wheatley(运动总监)
‐ Christian Horner(领队)
‐ Adrian Newey(技术总监)
梅赛德斯车队提出:
根据国际汽联《运动规则》第48.12条,...任何被领先者套圈的车辆都必须回超过领先者和回超安全车(..any cars that have been lapped by the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the safety car” ),...一旦最后一台被套圈的赛车回超完领先者,安全车将在下一圈结束时返回维修站。(…once the last lapped car has passed the leader the safety car will return to the pits at the end of the following lap.”)”
梅赛德斯车队辩称,如果遵守了这一规定,44号赛车(汉密尔顿)就会赢得比赛。因此,他们要求干事根据国际汽联《运动规则》第11.9.3.h条修改比赛排名。
红牛车队提出:
《运动规则》第48.12条中的“Any(任何)”并不代表“All(所有)”
《运动规则》第48.13条中的“安全车本圈返回”是指安全车即将在本圈结束后返回维修区。
因此,《运动规则》第48.13条“覆盖”了第48.12条。
《运动规则》第15.3条赋予了赛事总监对安全车的使用的权力。
即使所有被套圈的赛车(总共8辆,其中5辆被允许解套)完成解套,也不会改变比赛的结果。
赛事总监的结论:
赛事总监表示,《运动规则》第48.12条的目的是移除那些会“干扰”领跑者之间比赛的被套圈赛车,在他看来,第48.13条是适用于这种情况的。
原文:The Race Director stated that the purpose of Article 48.12 was to remove those lapped cars that would “interfere” in the racing between the leaders and that in his view Article 48.13 was the one that applied in this case.
赛事总监表示,所有车队先前就同意,在可能的情况下,希望比赛以“绿色”状态结束(即不安全车带领下完赛)。
原文:The Race Director also stated that it had long been agreed by all the Teams that where possibleit was highly desirable for the race to end in a “green” condition (i.e. not under a Safety Car).
在考虑了双方的各种陈述后,仲裁委员会决定如下:
《运动规则》第15.3条允许赛事总监控制安全车的使用,其中包括部署和撤出的决定。
原文:That Article 15.3 allows the Race Director to control the use of the safety car, which in our determination includes its deployment and withdrawal.
《运动规则》第48.12条可能没有充分应用, 但第48.13条可以覆盖掉第48.12条,一旦显示“安全车本圈返回”的信息,安全车在该圈结束时必须返回维修区。
原文:That although Article 48.12 may not have been applied fully, in relation to the safety car returning to the pits at the end of the following lap, Article 48.13 overrides that and once the message “Safety Car in this lap” has been displayed, it is mandatory to withdraw the safety car at the end of that lap.
尽管梅塞德斯车队要求赛事干事们通过修改比赛排名来弥补这个问题,以倒数第二圈排名为准,但赛事干事们认为这一步骤实际上是缩短了比赛时间,因此不适用。
原文:That notwithstanding Mercedes’ request that the Stewards remediate the matter by amending the classification to reflect the positions at the end of the penultimate lap, this is a step that the Stewards believe is effectively shortening the race retrospectively, and hence not appropriate.
因此,上诉被驳回,上诉保证金不予退还。
根据《运动规则》第15条以及《 国际汽联司法规则》第四章,参赛者在规定的时间内有权对仲裁委员会的某些决定提出上诉。
#梅赛德斯车队抗议被驳回# #国际汽联确认维斯塔潘夺得世界冠军# #F1#
在充满戏剧性的阿布扎比大奖赛结束后,梅赛德斯车队针对比赛中的两个有争议的部分,并根据《根据国际汽联运动规则》中的48.12及第48.8条款向FIA国际联提出上诉,但均遭到了驳回,下面就让我们一起来看看双方的辩论以及FIA给出的驳回理由。
梅赛德斯车队代表成员:
‐ Ron Meadows(运动总监)
‐ Andrew Shovlin(赛道工程总监)
‐ Paul Harris (车队法律顾问)
红牛车队代表成员:
‐ Jonathan Wheatley(运动总监)
‐ Christian Horner(领队)
‐ Adrian Newey(技术总监)
梅赛德斯车队提出:
根据国际汽联《运动规则》第48.12条,...任何被领先者套圈的车辆都必须回超过领先者和回超安全车(..any cars that have been lapped by the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the safety car” ),...一旦最后一台被套圈的赛车回超完领先者,安全车将在下一圈结束时返回维修站。(…once the last lapped car has passed the leader the safety car will return to the pits at the end of the following lap.”)”
梅赛德斯车队辩称,如果遵守了这一规定,44号赛车(汉密尔顿)就会赢得比赛。因此,他们要求干事根据国际汽联《运动规则》第11.9.3.h条修改比赛排名。
红牛车队提出:
《运动规则》第48.12条中的“Any(任何)”并不代表“All(所有)”
《运动规则》第48.13条中的“安全车本圈返回”是指安全车即将在本圈结束后返回维修区。
因此,《运动规则》第48.13条“覆盖”了第48.12条。
《运动规则》第15.3条赋予了赛事总监对安全车的使用的权力。
即使所有被套圈的赛车(总共8辆,其中5辆被允许解套)完成解套,也不会改变比赛的结果。
赛事总监的结论:
赛事总监表示,《运动规则》第48.12条的目的是移除那些会“干扰”领跑者之间比赛的被套圈赛车,在他看来,第48.13条是适用于这种情况的。
原文:The Race Director stated that the purpose of Article 48.12 was to remove those lapped cars that would “interfere” in the racing between the leaders and that in his view Article 48.13 was the one that applied in this case.
赛事总监表示,所有车队先前就同意,在可能的情况下,希望比赛以“绿色”状态结束(即不安全车带领下完赛)。
原文:The Race Director also stated that it had long been agreed by all the Teams that where possibleit was highly desirable for the race to end in a “green” condition (i.e. not under a Safety Car).
在考虑了双方的各种陈述后,仲裁委员会决定如下:
《运动规则》第15.3条允许赛事总监控制安全车的使用,其中包括部署和撤出的决定。
原文:That Article 15.3 allows the Race Director to control the use of the safety car, which in our determination includes its deployment and withdrawal.
《运动规则》第48.12条可能没有充分应用, 但第48.13条可以覆盖掉第48.12条,一旦显示“安全车本圈返回”的信息,安全车在该圈结束时必须返回维修区。
原文:That although Article 48.12 may not have been applied fully, in relation to the safety car returning to the pits at the end of the following lap, Article 48.13 overrides that and once the message “Safety Car in this lap” has been displayed, it is mandatory to withdraw the safety car at the end of that lap.
尽管梅塞德斯车队要求赛事干事们通过修改比赛排名来弥补这个问题,以倒数第二圈排名为准,但赛事干事们认为这一步骤实际上是缩短了比赛时间,因此不适用。
原文:That notwithstanding Mercedes’ request that the Stewards remediate the matter by amending the classification to reflect the positions at the end of the penultimate lap, this is a step that the Stewards believe is effectively shortening the race retrospectively, and hence not appropriate.
因此,上诉被驳回,上诉保证金不予退还。
根据《运动规则》第15条以及《 国际汽联司法规则》第四章,参赛者在规定的时间内有权对仲裁委员会的某些决定提出上诉。
#梅赛德斯车队抗议被驳回# #国际汽联确认维斯塔潘夺得世界冠军# #F1#
✋热门推荐